How the study of stylistics can help improve one’s English Language Essay

Write an raise that discusses how the test of rhetoricals/ voice communication in literary works screw melt mend unitys side of meat wording. (1500-2000 words)To answer the top dog of how stylistics improves ones face expression is to read the question itself. The word improves in the question entails that the person or disciple al havey has at least a basic knowledge and understanding of the side of meat oral communication and he/she wants to counterbalance that knowledge better. There ar many disciplines that learners of the English language can venture into to uphold them improve their literacy competence. One of those aforementioned disciplines is in fact The chew over of language in literature or Stylistics. Hence, this is where stylistics as a branch of study from the main trunk of the English quarrel and belles-lettres tree plays an alternative role in enhancing ones English Language capabilities. This paper will attempt to explain the logics of how st ylistics can booster in improving students English with an analogy.Studying stylistics is just like the work out of language learning and the subsequent discipline that comes with it. Language learning is oddly challenging for intimately passel especially to those who argon trying to ascertain it at a later age. Just like any otherwise language, the English Language requires the learner to read English books extensively, try their take best to understand the language with the help of teachers and dictionaries, and workout speaking the language as much as he/she can. In regards to this essay, there are several focusings how the study of stylistics can help improve students English language. Firstly, stylistics enriches students slipway of thinking nigh language. Secondly, it improves their skills of English and finally, stylistics propels students to act as a linguistic scientist and literary critic at the comparable time which in second make them competent procedurer s of the language.Before diving into the content, one postulate to comprehend the definition of stylistics first. Stylistics is understood as that part of linguistics, as food turner describes in Stylistics (1975), which concentrates on variation in the most cognizant and k nonty uses of language in literature. According to A.J. Jassim, it is possible to say that stylistics direction the study of literary discourse from a linguistic orientation which offers an area of jolt between literary criticism and linguistics. Therefore one can desexualize operationally that, the word stylistics is basically made up of thecomponents of flare and istics and that style refers to literary criticism and istics refers the general make-up for the linguistic component of the study (2006). Now, moving onto the discussions, firstly, stylistics enriches students ways of thinking about language. It is universally acknowledged that language serves many functions and one of it is to communicate mean ingful expressions.In written text, language is seen, as Eifring and Theil asserts, a communicative system based upon words and the confederacy of words into sentences and this is known as linguistic communication (2005). One way how stylistics specifically plays a role in enriching students ways of thinking about language is for example, when poets write poetry, they are not writing it without their active understanding of language. Sometimes, they deliberately incorporate deviations and parallelism in their works to serve a specific function. Through this unconventional use of language, they are attempting to convey a deeper meaning within the text and most Stylisticians argue that only by dint of stylistics, these literary devices can be observed, analysed and understood. Where some(prenominal) advocate extensive or authentic recitation almost for its own sake, Hall explains (2007), as a result of which the language will be absorbed, the advocate of stylistics as a means to develop language proficiency is committed to the value of conscious attention to details of linguistic features foregrounded in a text, whether through deflection of some kind, or simply as the consequence of repetitions, parallelism or other such salient patternings seen to contribute significantly to meaning.Students in turn become more sensitive in utilizing English especially when attempting to read and comprehend literature better. Secondly, stylistics improves students skills of the English Language. This is because in put together to apply stylistic compend or criticism on a literary text, students use up to first master the language from the onset. This entails that students need to, as mentioned earlier, read extensively which in turn heightens their vocabulary and mental lexicon. They also need to understand the language very well especially in regards to grammar and tenses. For all the arguments that are presented, it is rightfully so that students need to be competen t users of the English Language so that they can apply their knowledge of grammar and lexicon in interpreting literary texts.This is because according to Katie Wales in A Dictionary of Stylistics (1990), thegoal of most stylistics is not simply to describe the formal features of texts for their own sake, but in fix up to show their functional significance for the interpretation of the text or in order to relate literary effects to linguistic causes where these are snarl to be relevant. This means the knowledge of grammar and tenses are very important elements for the student to get a strong grasp on because in some poetry, poets intentionally use deviations to foreground important features in their works. Researchers such as Van Peer (1986) have found that readers or students do indeed clop up on the smallest details of a text and use them to make water meaningful interpretations.A good example can be seen in the stylistic depth psychology of (listen) taken from E. E. Cummings 1 964 collection 73 Poems, of which it is reckon 63. The poem (listen) is typical of Cummings style and contains striking irregularities of form in comparison to traditional poetry. There is a high probability to those reading this poem, whom are not partial towards stylistics, will consider it as a complete mess and an overall bad piece of poetry because of the freaky use of punctuation and the seemingly odd structure of particular phrases. An draw out of the poem is displayed below(listen)this a dog barks andhow crazily houseseyes people smilesfaces streetssteeples are eagerlytumbling through wonderful sunlight look selves,stir twisto-p-e-n-i-n-g(line 1-12)One of the sympathys for Cummings use of deviation is not simply for shock value, as Shaikh debates, and the linguistic choices he makes are by no means arbitrary (2012). In the past, some critics have even disregarded his causa use of language, claiming that it is of no interpretative significance. What these critics overlook ed and not aware of is that one will be able to explore and experience the beauty and shrewdness of the poem hidden within the mess once they apply stylistic criticism unto it. (listen) is not a, for the most part, difficult poem to analyse in terms of the complexity of the subject matter. It is the process of making sense of the grammatic mess in the text that is the sole source of headache. What is most challenging is to relate the various atypical stylistic features that Cummings has elect to use to ones overall interpretation of the text. Finally, stylistics propels students to act as two linguists and literary critics at the same time.In fact, the purpose of stylistics is to be the bridge of linking the two disciplines linguistics and literary criticism. Nevertheless, it is rather unfortunate as McIntyre (2012) states that since the e commixnce in the 1960s of English Language as a university subject in its own right, the relationship between the study of literature and the s tudy of language has often been one of bitter rivalry (p. 1). Experts in the literary field criticize against the cold, scientific approach that is adopted by linguistic scholars in their analysis of literary texts. At the same time, similar critical judgements are imposed by linguistic scholars towards literary experts because they are too subjective and vague in the analyses they cook. Despite the struggle between the clashes of these two spheres of language studies, there lies exquisiteness when one can merge the two fields and use their respective theories and means of analyses to understand a literary text well.Since stylistics is neither pure linguistics nor sheer literary criticism, a stylistician is, thus, intended to act possibly as a linguist and as a literary critic as well. To link two, the task of the linguist and that of the literary critic, stylistics emerges as a connective means to parade how the linguistic elements act significantly in a text to produce a com municable message. The function of stylistics is to help the reader stimulate, the significance of a literary text by analysing the interrelations between its linguistic items. This approach is basically selective. It aims to identify the stylistically significant, or stylistically distinctive, features in a literary text and to study their function in the text as a whole. Stylistics occupies the middle ground between linguistics and literary criticism andits function is to mediate between the two. In this role, its concerns necessarily overlap with those of the two disciplines.It is for this reason that stylistic analysis shades indiscernibly into literary appreciation. Therefore, literary analysis seeks the attention of stylistic analysis which is of a complementary nature to it. Stylistic analysis usually seeks to identify what stimulates and guides the reader or listener in the literary work. But there is no specific and restricted technique to fare (Fairly, 1979). Despite it all, this act of propelling one to act as both linguist and literary critic stretches his or her potential to the maximum towards cosmos a very competent user of English language thence whether they like it or not, it will improve their English. One needs practice a great deal so that they get the stylistic analysisOn the grounds of how learning language is similar to how learning stylistics help can improve ones Englis, as reiterated throughout this paper, both disciplines require the students to read extensively, understand and practice the skill in order to improve their language competency. In conclusion, with all the arguments which is presented in the above discussions, stylistics does help in improving ones or students English language. Firstly, stylistics enriches students ways of thinking about language. Secondly, it improves their basic skills of the language and finally, stylistics propels students to act as a linguist and literary critic at the same time which in turn make them competent users of the English language. Students especially can use stylistics to sustain and defend an interpretation of a poem, or any literary texts for instance, and they can also use stylistics to highlight elements of a poem that we dexterity otherwise fail to notice.ReferencesAbdul Jalil Jassim Hejal (2006) Stylistics A contact between Linguistics and literary Criticism. J. of Col. of Basic Education. Pdf. Web. Retrieved from http//www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=69572 Eifring, Halvor & Theil, Rolf (2005). Linguistics for Students of Asian and African Languages.Pdf. Web. Retrieved from http//www.uio.no/ Fairly, Irene R. (1979). Experimental Approaches to Language in Literature Reader Responses to Poems in Style. Vol. 13 , no . 4 . Hall, Geoff. (2007) Stylistics in Second Language Contexts A Critical Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, New York Wales, Katie. A Dictionary of Stylistics. London Longman, 1990. McIntyre, D. (2012). Linguistics and literature stylis tics as a dig for the literary critic (Vol. 1, pp. 1-11). SRC Working Papers. Naushad Umarsharif Shaikh. (2011) Role of Stylistics in Learning English as a Second Language. Pdf. Web. Retrieved from http//www.languageinindia.com/aug2011/naushadstylisticslanguagelearning.pdf Turner , G.W. (1975). Stylistics. Benguin Books. London.